Free speech: What everyone needs to know
Material type:
TextLanguage: English Series: What everyone needs to know ; vol. 1Publisher: [2024]Description: xi, 264p.; 21 cmContent type: - text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9780197699652
- 9780197699645
- W:91.73 R4
Textbook
| Cover image | Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Materials specified | Vol info | URL | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | Item hold queue priority | Course reserves | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Textbook
|
Arts Library | Arts Library | W:91.73 R4 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | AL1804219 |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 243-249) and index.
Overview of free speech fundamentals -- The most important arguments for and against free speech -- Free speech rights that the First Amendment protects -- First Amendment standards for determining which speech restrictions are (im)permissible -- Speech restrictions that the First Amendment bars or strictly limits -- First Amendment rights in specific government institutions, such as public schools and universities -- Other legal protections for free speech, in addition to the First Amendment -- Important current free speech issues.
"This book explains the key principles of modern First Amendment law, showing that it embodies universal values and is eminently sensible; it lets government outlaw the most dangerous speech - speech that directly causes or threatens imminent harm, such as intentional incitement of imminent violence -- while outlawing the most dangerous censorship - restrictions on speech solely due to its unpopular or vaguely feared ideas. Before the modern Supreme Court adopted these speech-protective precepts - which are often summarized as the "emergency" and "viewpoint neutrality" principles - the government had discretion to restrict speech with an indirect, speculative connection to potential harm under the "bad tendency" test; it predictably wielded such discretion disproportionately to suppress its critics and advocates of human rights and social justice causes"-- Provided by publisher.
There are no comments on this title.
