| 000 | 03027cam a2200445 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 23166198 | ||
| 005 | 20250606113353.0 | ||
| 008 | 230601s2023 nyu b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 2023026350 | ||
| 020 | _a9780197699652 | ||
| 020 | _a9780197699645 | ||
| 037 | _cTB | ||
| 040 |
_aAL _beng _erda _cAL |
||
| 041 |
_2eng _aeng |
||
| 042 | _apcc | ||
| 043 | _an-us--- | ||
| 084 |
_aW:91.73 R4 _qAL |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aStrossen, Nadine _eauthor. _9810140 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFree speech: _bWhat everyone needs to know |
| 260 |
_aNew York, USA: _bOxford University Press, _c2024. |
||
| 264 | 1 | _c[2024] | |
| 300 |
_axi, 264p.; _c21 cm. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
| 365 |
_b74.00 _cUSD |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aWhat everyone needs to know; _vvol. 1 |
|
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 243-249) and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aOverview of free speech fundamentals -- The most important arguments for and against free speech -- Free speech rights that the First Amendment protects -- First Amendment standards for determining which speech restrictions are (im)permissible -- Speech restrictions that the First Amendment bars or strictly limits -- First Amendment rights in specific government institutions, such as public schools and universities -- Other legal protections for free speech, in addition to the First Amendment -- Important current free speech issues. | |
| 520 |
_a"This book explains the key principles of modern First Amendment law, showing that it embodies universal values and is eminently sensible; it lets government outlaw the most dangerous speech - speech that directly causes or threatens imminent harm, such as intentional incitement of imminent violence -- while outlawing the most dangerous censorship - restrictions on speech solely due to its unpopular or vaguely feared ideas. Before the modern Supreme Court adopted these speech-protective precepts - which are often summarized as the "emergency" and "viewpoint neutrality" principles - the government had discretion to restrict speech with an indirect, speculative connection to potential harm under the "bad tendency" test; it predictably wielded such discretion disproportionately to suppress its critics and advocates of human rights and social justice causes"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
| 610 | 1 | 0 |
_aUnited States. _tConstitution. _n1st Amendment. _9812020 |
| 650 | 0 |
_aFreedom of speech _zUnited States. _9812021 |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aPolitical Science | |
| 650 | 0 | _aElections | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iOnline version: _aStrossen, Nadine. _tFree speech _dNew York : Oxford University Press, 2023 _z9780197699669 _w(DLC) 2023026351 |
| 906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
| 942 |
_2CC _cTB _hW:91.73 R4 _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c1431466 _d1431466 |
||