000			01655nam a2200241Ia 4500
003			OSt
005			20251113124409.0
008			220909b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
037			_cTextual
040			_aCSL _beng _cCSL
041			_aeng
084			_aV:71 Q3 _qCSL
100			_aGonzalez-Ruibal, Alfredo _eauthor _9851171
245		0	_aReclaiming archaeologybeyond the tropes of modernity
260			_aNew York : _bRoutledge, _c2013.
300			_axv, 375p. _b: ill.
500			_aIndex 367-375p.
520			_aArchaeology has been an important source of metaphors for some of the key intellectuals of the 20th century: Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, Alois Riegl and Michel Foucault, amongst many others. However, this power has also turned against archaeology, because the discipline has been dealt with perfunctorily as a mere provider of metaphors that other intellectuals have exploited. Scholars from different fields continue to explore areas in which archaeologists have been working for over two centuries, with little or no reference to the discipline. It seems that excavation, stratigraphy or ruins only become important at a trans-disciplinary level when people from outside archaeology pay attention to them and somehow dematerialize them. Meanwhile, archaeologists have been usually more interested in borrowing theories from other fields, rather than in developing the theoretical potential of the same concepts that other thinkers find so useful.
650			_a Epistemology _9851172
650			_a Materiality _9851173
650			_aHeritage _9851174
942			_hV:71 Q3 _cTEXL _2CC _n0
999			_c14361 _d14361