| 000 | 01579nam a2200253Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20250714153942.0 | ||
| 008 | 220909b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9783658072582 | ||
| 037 | _cTextual | ||
| 040 |
_aCSL _beng _cCSL |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 084 |
_aB2T0bX:8D Q5 _qCSL |
||
| 100 |
_aUnger, Albina _eauthor _9815559 |
||
| 245 | 0 | _aUse of risk budget in portfolia optimization | |
| 260 |
_aGermany : _bSpringer Gabler, _c2015. |
||
| 300 |
_axxiv, 424p. _b: ill. |
||
| 500 | _aappendix 371-390p.; Bibliography 391-424p. | ||
| 520 | _aRisk budgeting models set risk diversification as objective in portfolio allocation and are mainly promoted from the asset management industry. Albina Unger examines the portfolios based on different risk measures in several aspects from the academic perspective (Utility, Performance, Risk, Different Market Phases, Robustness, and Factor Exposures) to investigate the use of these models for asset allocation. Beside the risk budgeting models, alternatives of risk-based investment styles are also presented and examined. The results show that equalizing the risk across the assets does not prevent losses, especially in crisis periods and the performance can mainly be explained by exposures to known asset pricing factors. Thus, the advantages of these approaches compared to known minimum risk portfolios are doubtful. | ||
| 650 |
_a Empirical studies _9815560 |
||
| 650 |
_a Theoretical _9815561 |
||
| 650 |
_aRobustness _9815562 |
||
| 942 |
_hB2T0bX:8D Q5 _cTEXL _2CC _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c8148 _d8148 |
||